minorthreat |

Tag: corruption




Worldwide Police Abuse

by minorthreat on Jul.14, 2009, under Happenings, Truth, Justice & Freedom, Videos

police abuse – la police maltraite – Polizei missbraucht – la polizia abusa – 警察は乱用する – 警察滥用 – 경찰은 학대한다 – a polícia abusa – полиции злоупотребляют – la policía abusa……… know your rights.

Leave a Comment :, , , , , , , , , more...



A closer look at Statutes

by minorthreat on Jun.15, 2009, under Politics, Truth, Justice & Freedom

Here’s a great breakdown of what a statute is, in terms of why a statute can be applied with the full force of the law and how that force is obtained and imposed upon the state by the legislature. It’s not as complicated as you think – and if properly noted – the knowledge could mean the difference between a hefty fine and a reasonably event-free day in court.

This is the commonly used definition of the word ‘Statute’. It raises some questions as most of us live our lives according to the rules of our various statutes and Acts they derive from, and yet in no part of that definition does it suggest that it is a Law. Rather it is a rule. Aren’t rules made to be broken? I would certainly say so; the more rules you break, the more you have to pay to the court!

Rather than finding the precise source, let’s discover whether this much-used definition is acceptable. So, can this definition be either disproved and discarded, or confirmed and accepted?

First, let’s look at a sourced definition of the term “statute”.

statute. An act of the legislature as an organized body. Washington v Dowling, 92 Fla 601, 109 So 588.

The written will of the legislative department, expressed according to the form necessary to constitute it a law of the United States or of the state, and rendered authentic by certain prescribed forms and solemnities.

In a broader sense, inclusive of an act of the legislature, an administrative regulation, or an enactment, from whatever source originating, to which the state gives the force of law. 50 Am J1st Stat § 2. (Ballantines, 3rd edition, Page 1212)

Let’s now use this as our base to work from …

In a broader sense, inclusive of an act of the legislature, an administrative regulation, or an enactment, from whatever source originating, to which the state gives the force of law.

act,n. A thing done or established; a deed or other written instrument evidencing a contract or an obligation. A statute; a bill which has been enacted by the legislature into a law, as distinguished from a bill which is in the form of a law presented to the legislature for enactment. Anne 5 ALR 1422. (Ballantines, 3rd edition, Page 16-17)

legislature. Broadly, any body having legislative power. 49 Am J1st States § 28. (Ballantines, 3rd edition, Page 724)

regulation. Control or direction by restriction or rule of something permitted or suffered to exist. 30 Am J rev ed Intox L § 22. Any rule for the ordering of affairs, public or private, whether by statute, ordinance, or resolution. Kepner v Commonwealth, 40 Pa St 124, 129. Ballantines, 3rd edtion, Page 1081)

state. A body politic or society of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by their combined strength, occupying a definite territory, and politically organized under one government. McLaughlin v Poucher, 127 Conn 441, 17 A2d 767. … a political community of free citizens, occupying a territory of defined boundaries, and organized under a government sanction and limited by a written constitution, and established by the consent of the governed. Coyle v Smith, 221 US 559, 55 L Ed 853, 31 S Ct 688. (Ballantines, 3rd edition, Page 1210)

Summary

An act of the legislature = legislative
An administrative regulation = a rule
The state = a political community, organized under a government, established by the consent of the governed.

In a broader sense, inclusive of an act of the legislature (legislative), an administrative regulation (rule), or an enactment, from whatever source originating, to which the state (political community established by the consent of the governed) gives the force of law.

Connect the dots;
A legislative rule, given the force of law by the political community established by the consent of the governed.

You are the governed. Do you give your consent?
via TPUC

Leave a Comment :, , more...



The truth about ‘Swine Flu’

by minorthreat on Apr.29, 2009, under Happenings, Truth, Justice & Freedom

I was beginning to despair, until I found Simon Jenkins‘ column in the Guardian today. Finally, someone talking some fucking sense. Here’s a few excerpts, link to the full article follows.

We have gone demented. Two Britons are or were (not very) ill from flu. “This could really explode,” intones a reporter for BBC News. “London warned: it’s here,” cries the Evening Standard. Fear is said to be spreading “like a Mexican wave”. It “could affect” three-quarters of a million Britons. It “could cost” three trillion dollars.
The BBC calls it a “potentially terrible virus”, but any viral infection is potentially terrible. Flu makes you feel ill. You should take medicine and rest. You will then get well again, unless you are very unlucky or have some complicating condition.
In Mexico, 2,000 people have been diagnosed as suffering swine flu. Some 150 of them have died, though there is said to be no pathological indication of all these deaths being linked to the new flu strain.
Nobody anywhere else in the world has died from this infection and only a handful have the new strain confirmed, most in America and almost all after returning from Mexico.
The risk of catching swine flu must be millions to one. Words such as possibly, potentially, could or might should be avoided. They are unspecific qualifiers and open to exaggeration.
During the BSE scare of 1995-7, grown men with medical degrees predicted doom, terrifying ministers into mad politician disease. The scientists’ hysteria, that BSE “has the potential to infect up to 10 million Britons”.
This science-based insanity was repeated during the Sars outbreak of 2003, to have “a 25% chance of killing tens of millions”. The press duly headlined a plague “worse than Aids”. Not one Briton died.
In 2006 with avian flu, a scientist named John Oxford declared that “it will be the first pandemic of the 21st century”. The WHO issued a statement that “one in four Britons could die“. The media went berserk, with interviewers asking why the government did not close all schools “to prevent up to 50,000 deaths”.
Meanwhile a real pestilence, MRSA and C difficile, was taking hold in hospitals. It was suppressed by the medical profession because it appeared that they themselves might be to blame. These diseases have played a role in thousands of deaths in British hospitals – the former a reported 1,652 and the latter 8,324 in 2007 alone.
MRSA and C difficile are not like swine flu, an opportunity for public figures to scare and posture and spend money. They are diseases for which the government is to blame. They claim no headlines and no Cobra priority. Their sufferers must crawl away and die in silence.

via The Guardian

1 Comment :, , , , , , more...

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!